| United States-English |
|
|
|
![]() |
HP Global Citizenship Report
>
Global citizenship at HP
>
Stakeholder engagement
Stakeholder Advisory Council |
|
HP’s Stakeholder Advisory Council (SAC) comprises NGO representatives and senior HP executives from our business units. The SAC provides HP with advice on current and emerging global citizenship issues. Its members’ feedback helps us to better anticipate and respond to business risks and leadership opportunities. NGOs were carefully selected for the SAC based on their expertise and influence on environmental and social issues, their willingness to collaborate with HP, their geographic locations, and their reputation with government bodies and other stakeholders. NGO representatives on the SAC are:
The SAC meets twice a year. Its initial meetings were held in January and October 2007. The NGO members helped HP identify and prepare for potential business risks and provided advice on our leadership strategy for global citizenship. At the meeting in January, the SAC focused on energy use and climate change. Recommendations included that HP position our work on energy efficiency as benefiting climate change more than simply saving energy, and that we begin to measure and reduce the climate impact of our supply chain. In October, the group concentrated on supply chain responsibility. As a result of that meeting, we have increased transparency about our suppliers by disclosing a list of our top suppliers.
In late 2007, we interviewed the five external members of HP’s SAC. We asked them to comment on HP’s approach to global citizenship and on our performance in the three priority areas we’ve identified: supply chain responsibility, climate and energy, and product reuse and recycling. The text below summarizes their responses.
Do you believe that global citizenship is integral to HP’s business strategy and creates value for the business? The SAC members agreed that global citizenship is becoming more central to HP’s business and that there is a lot of activity in this area within the company.
Participants noted that HP’s strategy is based on the belief that global citizenship creates financial value rather than simply satisfying charitable commitments. Members discussed how HP can better highlight evidence of this value in our report, perhaps by noting contracts in which environmental requirements were a factor or promoting the cost benefits of environmental stewardship. One member commented that HP does not effectively promote the environmental benefits of its products, and several members mentioned the opportunity for HP to take a greater leadership role in this area.
Do you believe HP has taken the lead in global citizenship, or that it has simply reacted to pressure from customers and other stakeholders? There was general agreement that HP has been a pioneer in its industry in many areas of global citizenship, and this has not been due to pressure from stakeholders alone.
SAC members said they regard HP as a leader across industries in some areas, such as its well-developed global citizenship strategy and programs, its stakeholder engagement and responsiveness, and its global citizenship reporting. There was agreement that HP’s progress in managing its supply chain responsibilities is less advanced than that of the apparel sector but at the forefront of the electronics industry. There was also a general sense that, while HP once led the industry in demonstrating producer responsibility and facilitating product take-back, it is now being challenged by competitors that are making progress in these areas.
One member pointed out that use of language such as “leadership” should be supported with evidence of HP’s relative performance.
What opportunities and risks do you think global citizenship issues present for HP? Several SAC members agreed that HP should better integrate global citizenship into its brand.
Building HP’s brand in Asia was highlighted as a particular opportunity, because participants believed that demonstrating a commitment to those communities through stakeholder engagement will foster brand loyalty.
Members also raised the potential risk of making significant public commitments, raising stakeholder expectations and then being seen as not “walking the talk.”
Some members suggested that HP manages these risks well but does not communicate its efforts externally.
The SAC advised HP to find the right balance between being realistic and stretching our commitments. This would enable stakeholders to appreciate our efforts while minimizing the risk of setting expectations too high and damaging HP’s reputation if some goals are not fully met. What will it take to show leadership in this area in the future? Participants offered a range of insights regarding what leadership in global citizenship will require moving forward.
The SAC members expressed their belief that HP is becoming more fully engaged with its stakeholders on supply chain issues. Several members mentioned that HP advocates change across the industry through the Electronics Industry Code of Conduct and engages with key stakeholders—including critics—to fully understand its supply chain responsibilities. But members agreed that while HP leads the information technology industry in this area, several apparel companies have many more experienced people on site in key sourcing countries. Some apparel companies employ auditors with five to ten years of experience with factory issues. HP has strong leadership at the top of its supply chain program but little presence at the country level. Members also advised HP to build greater capacity within its wider supply chain:
Members acknowledged that HP has clear programs addressing the energy use of its products and operations and is working to meet its targets. But they said there is much more the company can do and encouraged us to be bold when talking about climate change.
There was agreement that other companies are making significant progress in this area and are closing the leadership gap HP created. HP made great early progress in establishing effective product reuse and recycling programs and maintains challenging goals in this area but, like the rest of the industry, has more to do.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||