Your browser (Internet Explorer 6) is out of date. It may not display all features of this website. Click here to update your browser

Footnotes

  • i Methodology—Technology Refresh: We’ve compared the energy consumption of comparable HP products in 2005 with our latest models for each category of products. Even with conservative assumptions, you can see that the savings are notable. Estimations of the energy consumption of 2005 products were done by using worldwide IDC shipped volumes, HP products, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s ENERGY STAR® program (www.energystar.gov) product averages, and the typical energy consumption (TEC) method. The energy costs are based on U.S. Department of Energy data (www.eia.doe.gov), and actual results may vary. We used the following products for this analysis: HP Deskjet 3050, HP LaserJet CP1215, HP LaserJet CP1025, HP Compaq 8200 Elite, HP Compaq 2310, HP Compaq 8000f Elite, HP Compaq LE19 monitor, HP StorageWorks EVA, HP ProBook 6550b, HP G60t Series Notebook, HP TouchSmart610 PC, HP ProLiant DL380 G4 and G6 servers, and the HP ProLiant DL360 G7 server.
  • ii EPEAT registered where applicable/supported. See epeat.net for registration status by country. Calculation per the HP Carbon Footprint Calculator. See www.hp.com/go/carbonfootprint.
  • iii Percentage of recycled material is based on empty weight.
  • iv For cartridges produced between 2005 and 2010. Based on a 2010 life-cycle assessment (LCA) performed by Four Elements Consulting and commissioned by HP. The study compared the environmental impact of using polyethylene terephthalate plastic (PET) with the environmental impact of using recycled polyethylene terephthalate plastic to manufacture new Original HP cartridges. For details, see www.hp.com/go/RecycledPlasticsLCA.
  • v Report to Congress on Server and Data Center Energy Efficiency, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, August 2007.
  • vi Based on documented client results obtained through using HP 3PAR Thin Provisioning Software and which are subject to unique business conditions, client IT environment, HP products deployed, and other factors. These results may not be typical; individual results may vary.